Under Armour Reign 6 vs Reebok Lifter PR 3 Review
I am looking at the Under Armour Reign 6 versus the Reebok Lifter PR 3 for my hybrid training in Montreal. I want a shoe that I can use for some heavy lifting but also for some accessory work and light cardio. I know the Reebok is more of a dedicated lifter while the Under Armour is a cross trainer.
I have used the older Reign models and they were very durable but I found the sole a bit too stiff for running. I am wondering if the new version has improved the flexibility. The Reebok Lifter PR 3 seems like a great budget option for those who want a heel but do not want to spend Nike prices.
Which one would you choose for a daily driver? I do not want to change my shoes twice in one session. If you have used either of these please let me know how they perform for things like lunges and rows after your main squats are done.
I've tried both the Reign 6 and the Lifter PR 3. For hybrid training, the Reign 6 is definitely more versatile. The Lifter PR 3 is great for pure lifting, but anything dynamic feels off.
Honestly, it depends on what "some accessory work and light cardio" actually means. If you're doing box jumps or burpees, the Reign 6 is probably better. If it's just walking between sets, the Lifters are fine.
Droz
The heel drop on the Lifter PR 3 is a game changer for squats, no doubt. But for deadlifts, I actually prefer a flatter shoe. So for hybrid, you're always making a compromise. Reign 6 is a good middle ground.
Jayne_Scott
Have you considered the Nike Metcon series? Similar hybrid concept, often a good alternative to the Reign. Might be worth checking out if you can find a good deal.
Push50
I've always found Under Armour's fit a bit snug for my wider feet. Reebok tends to be more accommodating. Something to consider if you're not trying them on in person.
Price point is also a factor, right? Lifter PR 3s are often on sale now that newer models are out. Reign 6 tends to hold its price a bit more.
For me, the stability in the Reign 6 for lateral movements is superior. If your accessory work involves any kind of agility or cutting, it's the clear winner.
I'm a big fan of the strap on the Lifter PR 3 for really locking my foot in during heavy squats. The Reign 6 just doesn't give me that same "connected to the floor" feeling. Personal preference, I guess.
If you're serious about heavy lifting, get proper lifting shoes. If you want a compromise for hybrid, then accept the compromise. Reign 6 is probably the best compromise here, but it's still a compromise.
Has anyone noticed durability issues with the Reign 6? I've heard mixed reviews on how long the sole holds up to varied training. My Lifter PR 3s are tanks.
I rotate between dedicated squat shoes, deadlift slippers, and CrossFit trainers. It's the ideal, but not everyone has the budget or desire for multiple pairs. For one shoe, Reign 6.
I'd lean towards the Reign 6 for overall comfort if you're spending a lot of time in them, even outside of sets. The Lifter PR 3s feel more like a tool you put on just for the lift.
My gym buddy swears by his Reign 6 for everything. He even cycles in them. I think it's overkill, but he loves the stability. Maybe I'm just old school with my flat soles.
For Montreal, consider how they handle different gym floors and potential quick transitions if you're doing outdoor elements. Reign 6 probably has better grip for more varied surfaces.